In silico evaluation of snake venom proteins against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A molecular dynamics study and simulation dynamic
Abstract
Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), a pathogen that belongs to the M. tuberculosis complex, causes
tuberculosis (TB), an infectious bacterial disease. Although it usually affects the lungs and results in pulmonary TB,
it can also lead to extra-pulmonary TB by affecting other regions of the body. TB, which ranks first on the list of
infectious diseases that kill the most people, affects one-third of the world’s population and has a high mortality and
morbidity rate. The clinical treatment of active TB infection mainly relies on the use of Isoniazid (INH) in combination
with three other drugs—rifampin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. However, the situation is getting worse due to the
rise of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Finding
more effective drugs is always a top priority. In this regard, animal venoms, such as snake toxins, contain antibacterial
chemicals that have significant therapeutic properties and prevent bacterial infections and disease progression. This
suggests that snake venom is a good natural source of promising novel anti-TB drugs.
Aim: This study examines the snake venom protein’s capacity in silico to interrupt the intracellular enzymes of Mtb,
which is responsible for the development of MDR-TB in humans.
Methods: From Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB)-Protein Data Bank, the active protein
structure of catalase–peroxidase, RNA polymerase, and snake venom proteins was derived. Using molecular docking
software such as PyRx, PyMOL, and Ligplot analyzers the interactions between those proteins and the targeted
intracellular proteins were evaluated.
Results: Our findings reveal fascinating affinities and interaction patterns between snake venom proteins and MDR-TB
intracellular enzymes. Analysis of the effects of these interactions and their capacity to impair catalase–peroxidase and
RNA polymerase showed that Russell’s viper venom proteins were active against the catalase–peroxidase system,
whereas Bothrops jararaca venom proteins were active against the RNA polymerase system.
Conclusion: This study highlights a prospective approach for advancing anti-TB agents by using snake venom
proteins to inhibit the growth, replication, and transmission of MDR-TB. This will provide a basis for exploring
pharmacophore-based drugs to combat MDR-TB infections